Ready Plastics

Plastic Material Comparisons — 46 Side-by-Side Guides

When two materials both appear to fit an application, the right choice depends on temperature limits, mechanical load, chemical environment, machinability, and budget. Each of the 46 versus pages below includes a full spec table with 8–12 rows of side-by-side data, cost and availability notes, and clear guidance on which material to select for specific use cases. Start with the category that matches your shortlist.

How to navigate: Find the two materials you're comparing, click the link, and read the TL;DR bullets first. The spec table gives you the numbers; the "When to choose X / When to choose Y" sections translate the numbers into decisions. Each page links back to both material hubs and to sibling comparisons.


High-Performance Comparisons

These comparisons involve PEEK, Torlon (PAI), Vespel (PI), PPS, Ultem (PEI), and Polysulfone — materials used in aerospace, medical, oil & gas, and semiconductor applications where operating conditions rule out commodity grades.

ComparisonKey Decision Factor
PEEK vs Ultem (PEI)Max temp 480°F vs 340°F; cost delta 2–3×
PEEK vs Torlon (PAI)Load-bearing at temp; Torlon stronger, PEEK more chemically resistant
PEEK vs DelrinTemperature and cost — PEEK at 4–6× the price of acetal
PEEK vs PTFE / TeflonDimensional stability vs chemical inertness
Torlon (PAI) vs Vespel (PI)500°F vs 550°F; Torlon machinable, Vespel thermoset-like
Vespel vs PEEKExtreme temperature and vacuum applications
PPS (Ryton) vs PEEKChemical resistance; PPS 425°F, PEEK 480°F; PPS lower cost
PPS vs Ultem (PEI)Flame retardancy and dimensional stability comparison
Ultem (PEI) vs PolycarbonateTemperature; Ultem 340°F vs PC 240°F; both amber/transparent
Ultem (PEI) vs Polysulfone (PSU/PPSU)Sterilization cycles, cost, and color stability
Polysulfone (PSU) vs PolycarbonateHydrolytic stability; PSU survives steam, PC does not

Engineering Thermoplastic Comparisons

Acetal, nylon, PET and PETG, and Noryl cover the widest range of industrial machined parts. These comparisons address the most common material selection questions engineers face.

ComparisonKey Decision Factor
Acetal vs NylonMoisture absorption — acetal dimensionally stable, nylon absorbs up to 9%
Acetal vs UHMWStiffness vs abrasion — acetal stiffer, UHMW more wear-resistant
Acetal vs PET (Ertalyte)Fatigue and creep — PET-P outperforms acetal in cyclic load
Nylon vs UHMWLoad bearing vs liner — nylon stronger, UHMW lower friction
Nylon vs Cotton PhenolicMachined gears and bushings — thermoset vs thermoplastic tradeoffs
PET vs PETGCrystalline wear grade vs amorphous thermoform grade
Noryl (PPO) vs ABSDimensional stability, humidity resistance, and temp rating
Noryl (PPO) vs PolycarbonateElectrical properties and steam resistance

Polyolefin & Commodity Comparisons

UHMW, HDPE, LDPE, polypropylene, PVC, and ABS — the volume materials for liners, tanks, guards, and enclosures. These comparisons clarify the cost-vs-performance tradeoffs within the commodity tier.

ComparisonKey Decision Factor
UHMW vs HDPEAbrasion resistance — UHMW 6× more wear-resistant than HDPE
UHMW vs PolypropyleneChemical resistance vs wear — PP better chemical, UHMW better abrasion
UHMW vs PTFE (Teflon)Friction vs load capacity — PTFE lower µ, UHMW handles higher loads
HDPE vs LDPEStiffness vs flexibility — LDPE for gaskets, HDPE for structural sheet
HDPE vs PolypropyleneTemperature and chemical resistance — PP edges out above 140°F
Polypropylene vs PVDF (Kynar)Chemical resistance upgrade — PVDF for halogens and oxidizers
PVC vs PolypropyleneStructural tanks and ducts — PVC stronger, PP lighter and more flexible
PVC vs ABSChemical resistance vs thermoformability
PVC vs PVDF (Kynar)Chemical duty upgrade — PVDF for chlorinated and oxidizing environments
ABS vs AcrylicImpact vs optical — ABS for tough enclosures, acrylic for clear displays
Polycarbonate vs ABSImpact strength vs cost
Polycarbonate vs Acrylic (Plexiglass)The classic optical plastics comparison
Polycarbonate vs PETGTemperature, thermoformability, and chemical resistance
Acrylic vs PETGOptical clarity vs formability
Acrylic vs ABSClarity vs impact toughness

Fluoropolymer Comparisons

ComparisonKey Decision Factor
PTFE vs PVDF (Kynar)PTFE lower friction, PVDF stronger and weldable
PVDF (Kynar) vs PTFE (Teflon)Same pairing — chemical processing angle

Thermoset & Laminate Comparisons

Phenolics and glass-epoxy laminates serve overlapping applications in electrical insulation and structural components. These comparisons clarify grade selection within the thermoset family.

ComparisonKey Decision Factor
G10 and FR4 vs Cotton PhenolicGlass-epoxy vs fabric phenolic for electrical insulation
G10 vs FR4Same base material — FR4 adds UL94 V-0 flame rating
G10 and FR4 vs Glass PhenolicEpoxy resin vs phenolic resin glass laminates
G10 and FR4 vs G7 (Glass Silicone)For 425°F+ and aerospace applications
G10 and FR4 vs G9 (Glass Melamine)Arc and track resistance in switchgear
G7 (Glass Silicone) vs G9 (Glass Melamine)High-temp aerospace vs arc-resistant switchgear
Cotton vs Linen PhenolicSurface finish and electrical properties
Cotton vs Canvas PhenolicPrecision gears vs heavy-duty industrial gears
Linen vs Canvas PhenolicImpact toughness vs dimensional precision
Paper Phenolic vs Glass PhenolicCost vs temperature and strength

About These Comparison Pages

Each versus page is structured the same way so you can get to a decision quickly:

  1. TL;DR bullets — 5–7 key differences at a glance
  2. Spec table — 8–12 rows of side-by-side property data (temp, strength, modulus, friction, chemical resistance, cost tier)
  3. "When to choose X" — 3–4 concrete use cases
  4. "When to choose Y" — 3–4 concrete use cases
  5. Cost & availability — pricing tier and typical lead times
  6. Common alternatives — links to 2–3 related comparisons

If you need to compare a material not listed here, go to that material's hub page — each hub links to all related versus pages from its comparisons spoke.

How Material Category Affects the Comparison

Comparisons within the same category (two engineering thermoplastics, two fluoropolymers, two phenolic grades) are usually cost and performance tradeoffs at similar temperature limits. Comparisons across categories (an engineering thermoplastic against a high-performance grade, or a commodity resin against an engineering grade) are typically temperature or chemical resistance upgrade decisions — you move up a tier because the lower-tier material has a specific failure mode in the application.

For cross-tier decisions, the application guides are often more useful than the versus pages, because they rank four to eight candidates against the application's actual requirements rather than comparing two materials abstractly. The Applications index links to all twelve guides. For within-tier decisions — acetal vs nylon, UHMW vs HDPE, G10 vs cotton phenolic — the versus pages give you exactly the data you need to choose.

All spec values cited in these comparison pages reflect typical values for the grades and forms Ready Plastics stocks. Material properties vary by grade, filler content, and form (extruded vs cast vs compression-molded). Confirm against the specific grade data sheet before design sign-off.

Get a quote on any material in these comparisons — cut to size or machined

Request a Quote →

All Comparisons

Ultem vs PolysulfoneUltem PEI vs polysulfone (PSU and PPSU) compared: temperature, steam resistance, impact, cost, and medical applications. Find the right autoclavable amorphous thermoplastic.Nylon vs Cotton Phenolic for Gears and BushingsNylon vs cotton-reinforced phenolic: compare dimensional stability, temperature rating, strength, and machinability for gears, bushings, and structural bearings.Torlon vs VespelTorlon (PAI) vs Vespel (PI): both handle extreme temperatures, but Vespel goes higher with no melt point. Compare cost, wear grades, and processability for aerospace and industrial applications.UHMW vs PolypropyleneUHMW vs polypropylene compared: abrasion resistance, chemical resistance, weldability, temperature, and cost. Choose the right polyolefin for your wear, chemical, or fabrication application.Ultem vs PolycarbonateUltem PEI vs polycarbonate compared across temperature, impact, flame rating, transparency, and cost. Choose the right transparent high-performance thermoplastic for your application.Vespel vs PEEKVespel vs PEEK: Vespel handles 550°F+ with no melt point; PEEK tops out at 480°F but costs 10-20× less. Compare when each makes sense for aerospace, medical, and semiconductor applications.UHMW vs PTFE (Teflon)UHMW vs PTFE compared: temperature limits, friction coefficients, chemical resistance, wear life, and cost. Pick the right low-friction plastic for your application.UHMW vs HDPEUHMW vs HDPE compared: abrasion resistance, weldability, thermoformability, cost, and applications. Choose between UHMW polyethylene and HDPE for your wear, fabrication, or tank application.PVDF vs PTFEPVDF (Kynar) vs PTFE (Teflon): PVDF is weldable, strong, and rated to 280°F. PTFE reaches 500°F with the lowest friction of any plastic but cannot be welded. Compare for chemical lining, seals, and fluid systems.PVC vs PolypropylenePVC vs polypropylene for tanks, ducts, and chemical piping: compare stiffness, chemical resistance, temperature ratings, and weldability. Type 1 PVC vs PP for industrial process applications.PTFE vs PVDFPTFE vs PVDF compared: temperature limits, chemical inertness, mechanical strength, weldability, machinability, and cost. Which fluoroplastic fits your application?PPS vs PEEKPPS (Ryton) vs PEEK: PPS offers 425°F continuous service and exceptional chemical resistance at lower cost; PEEK delivers superior mechanical strength, FDA compliance, and 480°F service. Compare for your application.PPO vs NorylPPO (polyphenylene oxide) and Noryl are closely related but not identical. Noryl is SABIC's PPO+polystyrene blend — the commercially dominant form. Understand the chemistry, grades, and why neat PPO is rarely stocked.Polysulfone vs PolycarbonatePolysulfone (PSU) vs polycarbonate (PC): PSU and PPSU autoclave where PC degrades in steam. PC is cheaper and optically clear. Compare for medical sterilization, hot water, and optical applications.Polypropylene vs PVDF (Kynar)Polypropylene vs PVDF (Kynar) compared: continuous use temperature, chemical resistance, cost, and best fit for high-purity, high-temperature, and general process piping.Polycarbonate vs AcrylicPolycarbonate vs acrylic: light transmission, impact strength, scratch resistance, weatherability, and cost compared. Choose the right transparent plastic for your project.Paper Phenolic vs Glass PhenolicPaper phenolic (NEMA XX/XXX/XXXP) vs glass phenolic (G3/G7/G9/G11): temperature, arc resistance, mechanical strength, machinability, and cost compared. Full engineering guide.PEEK vs Ultem (PEI)PEEK vs Ultem PEI compared across temperature, strength, cost, and applications. Find out which high-performance thermoplastic fits your engineering requirements.PEEK vs Torlon (PAI)PEEK vs Torlon PAI compared: temperature limits, tensile strength, machinability, and post-cure requirements. Choose the right high-performance thermoplastic for your application.PEEK vs Acetal CopolymerPEEK vs acetal copolymer (Celcon, Hostaform) compared: temperature, chemical resistance, hot-water performance, and cost. Know when the application demands PEEK and when copolymer acetal is the right call.PVC vs PVDFPVC vs PVDF: compare continuous temperature, chemical resistance, purity, and cost. Type 1 PVC for general chemical service; PVDF for ultrapure water, semiconductor, and 280°F applications.PVC vs ABSPVC vs ABS plastic: compare chemical resistance, impact strength, machinability, paintability, and applications. PVC for ducts and chemical tanks; ABS for housings and machined parts.PPS vs UltemPPS vs Ultem (PEI): PPS is crystalline, opaque, and chemical-resistant to 425°F. Ultem is amorphous, transparent amber, FDA/aerospace-rated to 340°F. Compare for chemical, aerospace, and dimensional stability applications.Polycarbonate vs PETGPolycarbonate vs PETG compared: impact resistance, temperature, chemical resistance, thermoforming, and cost. Both are clear plastics — learn which transparent engineering material fits your display, protective cover, or fabrication application.Polycarbonate vs ABSPolycarbonate vs ABS compared: impact strength, temperature limits, transparency, machinability, thermoforming, and cost. Decide between PC and ABS for enclosures and structural parts.PEEK vs PTFEPEEK vs PTFE compared: structural strength, chemical resistance, friction, creep, and machinability. Determine which high-performance fluoropolymer or semicrystalline plastic fits your application.Linen vs Canvas PhenolicLinen phenolic (Grade L/LE) vs canvas phenolic: surface finish, dimensional stability, impact resistance, and application fit. Fine bearings vs heavy mechanical use explained.Nylon vs UHMW PolyethyleneNylon vs UHMW-PE: compare strength, friction, abrasion resistance, FDA compliance, and temperature range. Find out which engineering plastic fits your wear or structural application.Noryl vs PolycarbonateNoryl (PPO) vs polycarbonate compared: transparency, impact resistance, electrical properties, dimensional stability, temperature rating, and best applications.G7 vs G9 LaminateG7 vs G9 laminate compared: continuous use temperature, arc resistance, dielectric strength, and best fit applications in electrical and switchgear assemblies.HDPE vs PolypropyleneHDPE vs polypropylene: compare density, chemical resistance, max temperature, FDA compliance, and weldability. HDPE for impact and tanks; PP for acids, lighter weight, and 200°F service.G10 vs G9G10 (epoxy glass) vs G9 (melamine glass) laminate compared. G9 offers better arc resistance and surface hardness; G10 delivers higher mechanical strength and moisture resistance. Full technical comparison.FR4 vs Phenolic Glass (GPO-3)FR4 (brominated epoxy glass, UL94 V-0) vs Phenolic Glass GPO-3 (phenol-formaldehyde glass, UL94 V-0) compared. Both achieve V-0 but through different chemistry with different strength, arc resistance, and cost profiles.PEEK vs DelrinPEEK vs Delrin (acetal homopolymer) compared across temperature, chemical resistance, strength, and cost. Understand when Delrin is sufficient and when the application demands PEEK's superior performance.FR4 vs G7FR4 (flame-retardant epoxy glass, UL94 V-0) vs G7 (silicone glass, 180°C Class H) compared for electrical insulation, temperature rating, and structural performance.G10 vs FR4Head-to-head comparison: G10 vs FR4. Analyze mechanical properties, thermal limits, flame ratings, and cost differences.PET vs PETGPET and PETG share a polyester backbone but behave very differently. PET is semi-crystalline with higher strength and chemical resistance; PETG is amorphous, clearer, and easier to thermoform. Full technical comparison.G10 vs Phenolic GlassG10 (epoxy glass, NEMA G10) vs phenolic glass (GPO-3, phenolic glass laminate) compared: strength, temperature, cost, and electrical insulation. Understand which glass-reinforced laminate fits your application.Noryl vs ABSNoryl (PPO) vs ABS compared: continuous use temperature, dimensional stability across humidity, electrical properties, cost, and machinability for enclosures and structural parts.HDPE vs LDPEHDPE vs LDPE: compare rigidity, weldability, density, temperature range, and cost. HDPE for tanks and structural sheet; LDPE for gaskets, liners, and low-temp applications.G10 vs G7G10 (epoxy glass) vs G7 (silicone glass) laminate compared for temperature rating, electrical insulation, and structural performance. G7 extends service to 180°C where G10 tops out at 130°C.G10 vs Cotton PhenolicG10 glass-epoxy vs cotton phenolic compared for strength, machinability, moisture resistance, and electrical insulation. Understand when each laminate fits your application and budget.FR4 vs G9FR4 (UL94 V-0 epoxy glass) vs G9 (melamine glass, high arc resistance) compared. FR4 wins on flame rating; G9 wins on arc resistance and surface hardness. Choose the right laminate for your switchgear or electronics application.FR4 vs Cotton PhenolicFR4 flame-retardant glass-epoxy vs cotton phenolic laminate: UL94 V-0 vs machinable phenolic. Compare strength, moisture, electrical properties, and cost for electrical insulation applications.Delrin vs Acetal CopolymerDelrin (acetal homopolymer) vs acetal copolymer compared: strength, centerline porosity, chemical resistance, and weldability. Learn which acetal grade to specify and why they are not the same material.Acetal vs NylonAcetal vs nylon head-to-head: moisture absorption, dimensional stability, friction, toughness, and temperature range. Find out which engineering plastic fits your part.Cotton vs Canvas PhenolicCotton phenolic (Grade C/CE) vs canvas phenolic: impact resistance, load capacity, and applications compared. Canvas for heavy bushings; cotton for general insulating parts.Acrylic vs ABS PlasticAcrylic vs ABS: clear optical clarity against tough impact resistance. Compare cost, machinability, chemical resistance, and ideal applications for each material.ABS vs AcrylicABS vs acrylic: compare impact toughness, optical clarity, paintability, and machinability. Know which plastic is right for enclosures, displays, and formed parts.Acetal vs UHMWAcetal vs UHMW compared: stiffness, machinability, abrasion resistance, friction, FDA compliance, and cost. Choose the right engineering plastic for your application.Cotton vs Linen PhenolicCotton phenolic (Grade C/CE) vs linen phenolic (Grade L/LE): surface finish, dimensional stability, machining precision, and applications compared. Which fabric-base phenolic is right?Acrylic vs PETGAcrylic (PMMA) vs PETG sheet compared: optical clarity, impact resistance, UV resistance, thermoforming, chemical resistance, and cost. Two popular clear plastics for display, signage, and fabrication applications.Acetal Copolymer vs PETAcetal copolymer (Celcon, Hostaform) vs engineering PET (Ertalyte) compared for machined parts. Copolymer wins on hot-water resistance and weldability; PET wins on stiffness, chemical resistance, and moisture stability.Delrin vs PETDelrin (acetal homopolymer) vs PET (Ertalyte) compared for machined parts: strength, wear resistance, dimensional stability, chemical resistance, and cost. Two of the most commonly specified engineering thermoplastics.